, , ,

More Than Meets the Eye

, , ,

We usually try and keep these dispatches light and entertaining. We know you'd rather read about "Tax Strategies for Somali Pirates" than, say, the latest regulations governing domestic international sales corporations. But every so often it's time to put on our serious face, and this is one of those times.

By now, of course, we all know that Congress spent their New Year's crafting a last-minute deal to avoid a "fiscal cliff" disaster. The "American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012" extended the Bush tax cuts, permanently, for incomes up to $400,000 for single filers and $450,000 for joint filers. Ordinary income above those thresholds will be taxed at 39.6%; corporate dividends and long-term capital gains will be taxed at 20%. The Alternative Minimum Tax is "patched" for good, and the estate tax is eliminated for estates under $5 million.

If your income isn't quite that high, you may think you've just dodged a bullet. But the sad reality is, you're probably already paying more tax, even if your income is nowhere near $400,000:

,

Calendar or Fiscal? Which is the right year for your business?

,

Did you start a business last year? No? Are you planning to start one this year? Did you know you can choose the tax year you intend to operate under? Choose well, because there are pros and cons for either method.

A tax year is an accounting period for which you must report your taxable income and business expenses, and the law requires you to operate according to a consistent tax year. The most common is the most obvious: the calendar year. However, businesses can also report based on a fiscal tax year and a short tax year.

Here are some tips for choosing the right period for your small business.

, , ,

Dying to Save Taxes?

, , ,

2013 is here, and after months of post-election sound and fury, we took a quick "test leap" off the dreaded "fiscal cliff." Look out below!

By this point, we're all familiar with the income tax consequences of the cliff. The Bush tax cuts expired, as scheduled, on December 31, sending everyone's taxes up. The 2% payroll tax holiday expired at the same time, with no hope of resuscitation. The Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT), which up until this week had never been indexed for inflation, still hadn't been "patched" for 2012, meaning it would catch 27 million more Americans in its claws. There are even new Medicare taxes and a 3.8% "unearned income Medicare contribution" on earned income and investment income for individuals earning over $200,000 and joint filers earning over $250,000. (Okay, those new Medicare taxes aren't technically part of the "fiscal cliff" -- but they don't give upper-income earners much reason to cheer 2013, either!)

But the fiscal cliff also threatened some dramatic estate tax changes as w

Final Tax Thoughts for 2012

2013 is almost here, and it looks like that old Grinch is leaving a "fiscal cliff" under everyone's tree. Here are a few final thoughts to help usher in the New Year:

"There's no line on the tax return that asks 'what are you not telling us?'" -- Robert Goulder (tax attorney)

"The rich, indeed, are different from the rest of us; they have shiftier tax lawyers." -- Jim McTeague (columnist, Barron's)

,

Tax Strategies for Santa Claus

,

As 2012 draws to a close, most of us are preparing to take time off and enjoy friends and family. But there's one famous name who works harder than anyone else this time of year — everyone's favorite fat man in a red suit, Santa Claus.

When you think of Santa, you probably focus on what he gives. But have you ever thought about what he pays? You can be sure the grinches at the IRS do!

Santa is most famous for his holiday gift-giving. His "North Pole Foundation" is set up as a not-for-profit under Internal Revenue Code Section 501(c)(3). But Santa also operates a second, highly profitable business focused on licensing and endorsements. (In that sense, he's like top athletes whose off-the-field income from endorsements

, ,

By Any Other Name

, ,

In Shakespeare's classic drama Romeo and Juliet, star-crossed protagonists from feuding families meet and fall in love. In Act II, when the impossibility of their courtship has become clear, Juliet leans out her balcony and declares to her lover "What's in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet." The line, of course, implies that Romeo's last name should mean nothing, and the two should be together.

Shakespeare may or may not have been right about love and roses. But what about taxes? Does that which we call a "tax," by any other name smell as sour? Apparently, Washington thinks not — if you pay attention to all the new euphemisms, you'd think Washington has given up imposing new "taxes" entirely!